And as long as you're already uglifying important buildings to rile up people for shits and giggles, put a giant statue of a dildo on the roof as well.
My point was that Docker purports to solve the sandboxing and security problems.
In reality, this is something that 90% of people who use Docker don't give a shit about. For the vast majority Docker is just a nice and easy-to-use packaging format.
The sad part is that
a) Docker failed at security.
b) In trying to solve the security problem Docker ended up with a pretty crufty (from a technical point of view) packaging format.
Maybe we need to start from scratch, listen to the devs this time and build something they actually want.
90% of the time Docker is used to solve the problem of "how do I upload this bucket of Python crud to a production server?" (Replace 'Python' with any other language to taste.)
A slightly smarter .tar.gz would have solved the problem just as well.
Reach, penetration and target audiences is like 95% of what modern advertising does.
Modern advertising works on simple statistics rules like "people who drink Pepsi might need heartburn medicine" or "people who recently bought home appliances might want to buy another one".
These things are simple applications of the CLT. No psychology or manipulation is needed or wanted.
Well, no. ML solves the classification problem, not the prediction problem.
E.g.: The "is this a cat picture" problem is effectively solved, but we _still_ can't reliably predict something as primitive as a simple binary proportion.
> Prudential Real Estate is a franchise operation. Prudential does not actually broker any real estate. Instead, a local franchisee pays a fee for the use of the name and logo and other services.
I don't know how contracting works, but for corporate project the rule is always "follow the money", then once you figure out the money flow, only then do the requirement gathering bit.
Doing it in the opposite order will result in tears.
You're right, doubleplusungood. We really need to submit a proper report to the authorities for this flagrant violation of gender correctness rules. Thank you for your vigilance, comrade.
The vast majority of applicants cannot code at all. And I mean that literally: they're at a loss at how to write a function that adds two numbers or counts the number of elements in a list.
Worse is that these guys can be employed as developers (even 'senior' ones!) for years and years in 'serious' enterprises.
How, you ask? By using copy-paste and cleverly navigating their enterprise processes and dodging responsibility.
Maybe this is what you mean by 'being good at working with others', but it's definitely not what I want in a software developer.
Source: I've interviewed a great deal of people for lots of positions over the years.
Yeah, you're right. Many hospitals encourage bad practices like gratuitous C-sections. (But then again many home birth proponents also encourage bad practices.)
I guess I'm saying that one should be less emotional at this point and more cautious and rational.
Git won because it was a) unopinionated and b) powerful enough to support arbitrary workflows for any enterprise.
For the enterprise, being 'uniform and predictable' is way, way, way down lower on the list of important criteria in version control. (And in fact may even be a negative, due to the weird legacy workflows many enterprises have.)
Yes to both.