The type of roles w/ non-degree holders matters here. I'm sure Google offers a great career in any of its roles, but the article makes it sound like positions Stanford grads apply to (PM + eng) already have lots of non-degree holders. Pointing at company-wide stats to support that claim is weaksauce. Over a third of Google employees are not engineers/PMs (if this is true: https://www.unifygtm.com/insights-headcount/google). Who's to say the vast majority of non-degree holders aren't clustered in their sales and support org? I think the 77% stat is a great signal, love to see reduced gatekeeping in any job market. But, signaling you'll find folks without degrees in eng squads across Google doesn't seem obvious.
I can share some real examples I've seen/heard of from trustworthy sources (I'm not there yet myself):
- Open an independent bookstore in a medium-sized midwestern city's downtown
- Get into the jewelry business (not sure if there was family business experience there);
- Open a coffee shop, this person had someone else manage it (must be nice);
- One past tech PM switched careers to become a traveling nurse and was loving it still ~5 years in;
- Wive's friend moved to montana and opened a dog grooming franchise
Note that virtually all require some money to either invest in opening a new business or re-train yourself in some new profession (college/grad school prob just means loans). Doesn't mean it's true for every option, but worth noting how often that's the case.
I think the cartel protects itself from an abundance of supply, that's part of the problem. If supply is high it should naturally translate to landlords cutting prices to compete. Instead, a cartel can coordinate to keep prices high or withhold listings to artificially constraint supply. That should keep rents high even during an abundance of supply. I read somewhere they're accused of doing exactly that.
Hi, my partner worked in technology strategy for a large healthcare system where she saw many derm AI-based applications evaluated over the last decade. (Dis)Incentives aside, they all followed a similar\ story arc overpromising in their research findings and underdelivering in actual care delivery. They've been around for longer than you'd imagine. I hope they reach their potential, but suggest approaching them with healthy skepticism.
This. Not to say companies always get comms right, quite the opposite, but there's entire org structures filled with people dedicated to crafting these communications and the decisions about wording and audience are probably debated to death internally. My personal hell, but I have to acknowledge it's existence and purpose.
Interesting thread, wonder if that was the internal backdrop for the decision to deploy their biggest deal ever in Adam Newman's new venture (which has several folks scratching their heads).
I'm surprised no one has raised the problem of senior managers and VPs underestimating and oversimplifying the complexity and LOE of work. It causes unrealistic timelines for others who do have to adhere to a release process (which is never perfect but certainly necessary). "Yes CEO, of course we can get that in by tomorrow, no problem."
When the work misses the impossible deadline the feedback usually points to an underperforming organization and rarely to unrealistic estimation.
It would be interesting to see the volume of visits by government office year over year. I have a feeling that periods around elections might look very different. Also would be interested to see distribution color-coded by industry. Mining and contracting should pop up for certain time periods and government agencies.
Carlos, super buen trabajo, felicitaciones!!
Llevo tiempo estudiando temas relacionados a tecnología vs. corrupción desde acá en Berkeley. Tengo testimonios interesantes de contactos que han vivido el cambio post-tecnología en el gobierno. Perú tiene harto potencial en esta área. Si necesitas ayuda en cualquier momento feliz de apoyarte!
I'm a Phantom owner and I'm skeptical about those flying time numbers. I get 15-18 minutes on the drone by itself, but if you add the weight of the gimbal and camera (~0.5lb) the flight time goes down at least 4 mins, AND the gimbal needs power from the drone's battery too. I've heard the Phantom's flying time with the working gimbal is more like 6-8 mins. But if you know what kinda shot you want, that could be more than enough, just get lots of extra batteries (and those have dipped in price, you can grab one for $12).
Yup, topography influences energy policy greatly in most countries. Peru is special because of its diversity...China-like in a much much smaller package. Mountains are good because of potential for hydroelectric plants, but not good to build a grid ON them. Jungle has proven a great source of natural gas, but the Andes mountains severs the jungle from the population centers on the coast.
I think solar for the mountain population is very interesting. They don't have anything at all now, not like we're increasing their current energy bill. It's cleaner than most other options, and very low environmental impact for these typical rural communities.
About time we got a perk -I'm Peruvian :). Seriously though, we've had more engineers graduating schools here and more money in state revenues, we're finally seeing that translate into smarter infrastructure projects.