If you are using the Docker single container deployment using the official image (sourcegraph/server) you will be affected, as that image is Enterprise free tier.
----
Hello,
We will be implementing changes to the Sourcegraph free tier on February 22, 2023 with the release of Sourcegraph 4.5. Details on the new free tier can be found here [1]. The changes are:
The maximum number of private repositories that can be synced to each instance will be reduced from unlimited to 1.
The free tier will no longer support SSO/SAML.
As an existing free tier user, we’d like to offer you a license key to keep your legacy free tier plan with the ability to sync unlimited private repositories. If you would like a license key to keep your plan, please submit this form by February 22 and we will gladly send you one.
Please note that without a license key, your instance will automatically move to the new free tier plan if you upgrade to Sourcegraph 4.5+. Instances that stay on version 4.4 or older will not be impacted.
In the same breath where Biden calls himself a "proud pro-labor president," he calls on Congress to break a strike. [1] The hypocrisy will make your head spin.
What's the incentive for the railroad companies to bargain in good faith with the unions instead of deliberately stalling and waiting for the federal government to break the strike preemptively? All downside risk has been removed.
Biden publicly backed the unions, waited for the midterm elections to finish, and then switched sides and backed the railroad companies.
Democrats backstabbing labor will fracture an otherwise solidly blue voting block in a time when Dems are winning races by single-digit percentage points.
No party in America supports workers' rights. Dems will say they do, but when push comes to shove, there is no one.
So it seems that your complaint is that certain things are not funded enough at a university. Why is your conclusion then to defund universities entirely? It seems like a non sequitur.
I was under the impression that their business was $70/year to backup your whole computer (all drives, completely managed). Their backup service grew 23% yoy, so I wouldn't call it in decline.
Can you go into why Google Drive is a better alternative? I can see 2 TB for $100/yr, but I don't think the products are exactly the same.
“When I was poor and complained about inequality they said I was bitter; now that I'm rich and I complain about inequality they say I'm a hypocrite. I'm beginning to think they just don't want to talk about inequality.”
I don't think it's shady marketing. The company is composed of several prominent software engineers (eg Brad Fitzpatrick of memcached fame). I think many folks on HN (myself included) are interested to see what they are working on. Especially as Brad left Google to work on it.
Because a housing crisis leads to skyrocketing home values. They benefit from increased housing prices.
Further, any countering increase in property taxes is dampened by Prop 13. So there is very little reason to sell and cash-in vs just holding on for longer as the problem worsens.
When you are a homeowner with an expensive house, you don't want more homes built. That will increase supply and lower price.
It's worth pointing out that for the vast majority of people doctors != insurance. The payer is not the provider.
The refrain of "people like their health insurance" deliberately conflates the two. People like their doctors, not their insurance. Doctors accept multiple insurance companies.
> Complaining about some people having more money than you just screams envy and childishness.
Where did he do that?
> No, they really are not. One is driven by envy and petty jealousy, and the other is motivated by a legitimate concern that someone might be living in poverty.
Screw off with the ad hominem. It doesn't suffice in lieu of a point.
> Complaining about some people having more money than you just screams envy and childishness.
So by your logic if you are poor and mention billionaires and income inequality then you are envious and full of petty jealousy. Therefore, only people who are well-off are able to even bring the subject up without being labeled as such. People who are well off have a vested interest in not bringing the subject up, as they maintain a comparative advantage with a cheap, underpaid supply of labor in their economy.
Every now and then, however, a well-to-do and handsomely paid software engineer with a conscious will bring up the subject. In which case, you can simply move the goalpost and label him as having petty jealously since they are probably not a billionaire.
In your framework, an economy with fatal inequalities will not be fixed. That's how you get revolutions.
> NVIDIA specifically requests that server OEMs not use their GTX cards in servers. Of course, this simply means resellers install the cards before delivering them to customers.