I'm just a miner who likes the premise of MMC a lot. I am definitely not FreeTrade, I find this thought disturbing. In fact I don't fully agree with his direction and may consider running for CEO at some point. But as of now I don't know a better fit (disclosure: I haven't voted for CEO yet, only submitted vote for the CMO guy). If you have better ideas and think you can take this coin in a better direction, I would love to see your nomination for CEO. It sounds like you are like me and liked the idea, so why not fix it, instead of just blame it? Is there a way to address the pre-mine concerns if there is a new CEO in place?
I thought he had less than 100K MMC. Once all coins are mined he will only have 1% of all coins, if that. Besides he can be outplaced as a CEO via voting. I looked at all coins, and I really like the setup for this one. I don't understand all the drama and politics around the pre-mine however. So while I'm diversified, I decided to dedicate some resources to MMC mining for fun. Am I missing something here? Is this really as big of a concern as you describe it? I've seen FreeTrade reward devs with 5000MMC here and there (that was equivalent to about $2K at the time). I haven't heard of the voting manipulation with the charity money, can you provide more info or links to the data in the block chain? I'd be curious to see that.