Hey, it's the guy who called Tesla a "good corporate citizen" just a few months ago. Let's add: breaking stay-at-home orders, called the US government "fascist" while praising China, hired people to hack the personal computers of a whistleblower (as reported in a recent deposition filing), extorted the California government, and forced their workers back to the factory floor amid the pandemic to the list of "good" things.
>Our lockdowns were so badly done they didn't even decrease the daily case count.
Is it any wonder? Look at the comments here. Look at guys like Elon Musk breaking quarantine for economic reasons and getting praised for it. Conspiracies abound.
This didn't happen in less partisan countries. Like absolutely everything else in the US, the lockdown became a political issue, for and against it.
Where I'm from, everyone took it seriously and in a matter of weeks we got down to ZERO active cases. Then again, we don't hate people who have different politics.
>There won’t be any more farmers in the future but only farming corporations.
Is this any different than, "pretty soon there won't be any local movie rental places (or retail places), it'll just be content delivery corporations"?
I do share concerns about this kind of movement, and think it needs to be done judiciously, in every industry. However, I do not agree that just because you're "small" or "independent" you are inherently better or care more. There are pros and cons. People are people and don't become "evil" by working for larger firms.
Silicon Valley seems to be very suspicious of corporate consolidation in every industry, but turns a blind eye as Facebook/Google/Amazon do it on a scale rarely ever seen.
>Why do people conclude that without making a valuation?
Most retail investors are not making any valuations whatsoever. The investment criteria is "this company's future is bright/bad", even though price is the most important factor. Then, recent momentum makes you look good...for now.
>Carmakers are also defined as a COVID19 critical industry, and every other carmaker manufacturing in the United States is either open, or capable of open today. This puts Tesla at a serious disadvantage.
So locking down is just "locking down", but arbitrarily classifying car building as essential during a massive economic downtown is a-okay with you? Seems reasonable.
>and every other carmaker manufacturing in the United States is either open, or capable of open today.
Wrong, many are opening on May 18th, which is when the government of CA would have opened Tesla. They couldn't wait 10 days.
>This puts Tesla at a serious disadvantage.
First of all, what does the health of the public have to do with the fairness of car competition?
Second, I thought Tesla had unlimited money and unlimited demand? What's the issue if they're closed for a few weeks?
The public health officials who, believe it or not know more about this than Elon Musk,said they want specific metrics met before opening. Period.
So Elon did what he does and is bullying them. He called the public health official in charge, a pediatrician at Oakland's Childrens Hospital "ignorant" and "unelected". His horrible fanbase is loving it,and spamming the Alameda County offices with complaints. Why doesn't he say that about the officials in China? He'd be out on his ass, that's why.
>It's a waste to society to have someone like Musk working in finance where he would largely be working on financial gain for a small number of individuals.
Where on earth does this narrative come from that Musk isn't working for financial gain?
The guy rammed a pay package beyond anything the world has ever seen past a weak board, and just took his first payment, $700MM+ in equity, which is far beyond what the company has ever earned in GAAP profits in its entire existence.
If he doesn't care about money, how do you explain that?
>you're misquoting me. I meant to say they are going back to work.
Oh, so when I asked if people were "going to go back to work like nothing happened", and you replied "Ackchyually, Asian countries are going back to work" you deliberately left out the "like nothing happened" part, and are now agreeing that it's not "back to normal"? Got it.
>Further compound that by countries like Sweden that are business as usual
Not true.
>You already know it will lead to higher unemployment since pandemic -> everyone staying home ->
In what other pandemics did everyone stay home and unemployment went way up?
>and yet their published numbers continually show greater engagement.
Do you think this might have anything to do with the fact that, as an advertising company, it's crucial that they are able to tell companies that engagement is increasing?