Using Dangerous AI, but Safely? [video]
youtube.com1 pointsby Jerrrrrrry0 comments
>This almost worked, but I found that the first chunk was always failing to transmit through the firewall
Magic numbers/header scanning or, if it was awhile back, BOM (byte order mark) messing stuff up. > The audience here skews towards those the truth.
The truth is that this sentence is believed by every audience ever convened.
Actually you are correct, I should had known better to type "truth", as if a thing existed. >I quit since.
apparently they have too :) >'thinking' vs 'just recombinating things
If there is a difference, and LLM's can do one but not the other... >By that standard (and it is a good standard), none of these "AI" things are doing any thinking
>"Does it generalize past the training data" has been a pre-registered goalpost since before the attention transformer architecture came on the scene.
Then what the fuck are they doing. >second order chilling effects
in the context of preventing leaks: if/when this nears ubiquity, the first ID'ing of leaks will obviously lead to the second effect of deterring further leaks. >their ability to outsmart Google
it knows all the words: that is why i should not had had to had reminded it incessantly. >continuing to obscure the entropic state of the x-M medium and remain plausibly deniable
lemme draw this out cuz you seem intimidated with simple abstractions.
We are pawns, hoping to be maybe a Rook to the King by endgame.
Some think we can promote our pawns to Queens to match.
Luckily, the Jester muses!