In Portugal (idk about other countries) we use something like:
- Use knuckles and spaces between them
- Start with left-most pinky knuckle (in
- Count across hand: knuckle (31), space (30), knuckle (31), etc.
- Jump to right hand's index finger knuckle after left index (so it's two times knuckle, when passing from left to right hand (for July and August) and continue.
Because only Crypto is used for money laundering, right?
You would never guess what other businesses that your reddit mind thinks are legitimate are also used for money laundering...
> You very much can unless you're completely out of touch with reality. For instance plenty of real world metrics show that ChatGPT has proved more useful within its first 15 days than cryptocurrencies have been in 15 years.
No you cant. Both are tools. You can't say "An hammer is useless because it's just used to bang stuff, while a knife can be used to open stuff up, cut, etc"
Also, AI has existed for 50+ years and only in the last decade it has found actual utility.
>If haters on HN can "undermine" your technology then you've admitted it's shit.
Lol, "my technlogy". I'm not in some sort of team. That's what I'm mocking. And what do you mean by that?
Even though there are scams, Blockchain have a lot of utilities.
You don't have as many scams in AI just because it doesn't involve money, but there are countless cases of people labeling stuff with "AI" or just some other shady stuff using AI to preform scams, spam and other malicious stuff.
Saying that "would be better handled by using a single trusted database and cryptographic signatures for verification", is the same as saying that "AI could just be replaced with Ifs and Elses and other algorithms, and all you are doing is just optimal solutions".
I'm just mocking the fact that HN seems to have the idea of "AI Good, Crypto Bad", even thought that both are just Trendy tech
It has utility nonetheless. You can't just measure things on "how many utilities/much utility" something has.
It has utility nonetheless.
Just find it funny how HN instead of embracing the utility/technology advancements that come with Crypto, it appears to undermine the significance of Crypto in an attempt to gain an edge in the competitive landscape on what is now popular.
Sorry, didn't know you were a 1984 connoisseur.
You didn't even refute my argument "In this case they add words in order to fit an ideology".
All you added was that you knew the book and understood it more than me.
I have read the book. In the case of 1984, they remove words. In this case they add words in order to fit an ideology.
Go back to reddit Mr. Not Pseudo Intellectual