f = lambda x,y: x+y
g = lambda y: f(3,y)
That's also currying right? I've always been a little confused as to why the style he advocates is necessarily better. I'm not a functional guy so I'm maybe I'm missing something, what is the benefit of syntactic sugar for partial application to the first (or last) argument of a function? What if I want partial application of a function with the middle argument specified? Now you're out of luck and have to do the above anyway.
It serves to distance it from the moment-based statistics like mean and variance at least.