Reservella: The shadowy company behind The Pirate Bay(arstechnica.com)
arstechnica.com
Reservella: The shadowy company behind The Pirate Bay
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/who-owns-the-pirate-bay-part-ii.ars
3 comments
I can't say I've been following this case closely nor am I a lawyer but... it sounds like the Pirate Bay guys are saying "we don't own the [possibly] criminal enterprise; we just run it." If the organization's activities are deemed illegal wouldn't anyone facilitating these activities be liable? Why does it matter whether they "own" it? How are, say, mafia bookies or web designers in the employ of illegal gambling operations websites treated under the law?
Is it really legal/possible to have a company with secret ownership?
You can't even own a house without the owner being public record - how can you do that with a company (corporation)?
You can't even own a house without the owner being public record - how can you do that with a company (corporation)?
I don't know. But the ownership of some parts of Ikea are also very confusing and nobody can prove what everybody knows about it.
To Kuik, it's just not enough to sign some mysterious papers, say that you no longer own the site, and then continue to operate as you have always done; if you want to avoid liability, stop doing the activity in question.
Sounds like something a judge might agree with.
Sounds like something a judge might agree with.