Information Management: A Proposal (1989)(w3.org)
w3.org
Information Management: A Proposal (1989)
https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html
4 comments
Until machine learning can fill the discipline gap in most groups of people, I don’t think we will see much success in those areas outside of specialized niches.
If curious see also
2016 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12787644
2009 (just one comment): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=483678
Others?
2016 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12787644
2009 (just one comment): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=483678
Others?
counterpoint https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYT2se94eU0
Please don't use the title field to editorialize. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do so in the comments. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
(Submitted title was "Are we any closer to Tim Berners Lee's original vision for information mgmt?")
If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do so in the comments. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
(Submitted title was "Are we any closer to Tim Berners Lee's original vision for information mgmt?")
Thanks for the note - won’t happen again.
Anyway, this article is about his original vision for the web, not the semantic web. When he talks now, I get the feeling that he is disappointed that the SW/linked data did not really take off. That said, from my perspective linked data, the use of standard Ontology’s, open knowledge graphs like DBPedia and Wikidata, and some hope for more integration into real AI systems (not just deep learning) is possible.