Is This The Greatest VC Pitch Prank Ever Pulled?(techcrunch.com)
techcrunch.com
Is This The Greatest VC Pitch Prank Ever Pulled?
http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/28/is-this-the-greatest-vc-pitch-prank-ever-pulled/
12 comments
Lovechild does not mean what you think it means. The phrase you seek is "flower child."
About flowers... Rachel Sequoia tried to sell me what she referred to as "choice nugs" at Hippie Hill in Golden Gate Park.
thanks!
I'm reminded of the Ali G "Ice Cream Glove" routine, in which he markets an idea to a number of investors (including Donald Trump). It's a great parody of VC pitches, particularly the "market sizing" (I use that term loosely) - "I googled 'ice cream' and I googled 'gloves'..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8-nnvtHvd0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8-nnvtHvd0
I was definitely going to bring up Ali G's ice cream glove the investor reactions were hilarious. At the end one investor was interested in it.
The fact that there is a question mark after the title tells me a lot about the state of mind we're in.
Now if she'd focused on the location based app to tag where she'd breathed, and mentioned the selling of bottled air at the very end as an irrelevant little monetisation detail, she'd have got the investment.
That's actually almost crazy enough to not be a prank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_Rock
"During its short run, the Pet Rock made Dahl a millionaire.[3] With the proceeds, he opened the ironically named "Carrie Nation's" bar in downtown Los Gatos, California."
"During its short run, the Pet Rock made Dahl a millionaire.[3] With the proceeds, he opened the ironically named "Carrie Nation's" bar in downtown Los Gatos, California."
I know what you mean. I'm appalled at such an idea - but I can't dismiss it as having no market. And the last line of the article seems to indicate some people have the same opinion.
That said, I have to say I'm not convinced of the business model.
However, I think I am going to invest in this founder anyway. If we can connect her with a good technical cofounder I can see great things in the future.
As everyone says, invest in the team, not the idea.
Considering ShareTheAir108.com was registered by a member of YC funded Messageparty (Jarod Reyes)...
AND Messageparty tweeted that their launch was imminent an hour after Jarod Reyes started pumping the Rachel Sequoia video on tumblr and twitter (without mentioning he was running the ShareTheAir site...)
I'm putting my money on this being a brooklyn.makery.org production.
AND Messageparty tweeted that their launch was imminent an hour after Jarod Reyes started pumping the Rachel Sequoia video on tumblr and twitter (without mentioning he was running the ShareTheAir site...)
I'm putting my money on this being a brooklyn.makery.org production.
Sorry, Amanda Peyton says no to my theory.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2383677
I am certain that we are now witnessing the birth of Web 4.0. If there is a bubble, then I am sure 'Share the Air' has already captured it for sale.
Brilliant.
This is a lot like my idea to buy up meat from endangered animal species and keep it on ice until the species reach extinction. Can you imagine how much I will be able to charge for extinct animal meat?
Brilliant.
This is a lot like my idea to buy up meat from endangered animal species and keep it on ice until the species reach extinction. Can you imagine how much I will be able to charge for extinct animal meat?
Thats actually pretty smart, since you will hasten their demise at the same time you increase your holdings and if cloning extinct animals is ever successful, you will own them all.
It is properly illegal, but these days what isn't?
It is properly illegal, but these days what isn't?
This is exactly what Mitsubishi is being accused of doing with bluefin tuna: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/revealed-the...
"Spinal Tap" meets "Startup.com"
She has balls i can only dream of.
She's probably an actress. Someone has obviously put a lot of thought and effort into this.
If she's not an actress and is in fact the mastermind, I apologise, kudos to her.
EDIT: Thinking about it, even if she is an actor, kudos to her regardless. I certainly couldn't keep a straight face doing that...
If she's not an actress and is in fact the mastermind, I apologise, kudos to her.
EDIT: Thinking about it, even if she is an actor, kudos to her regardless. I certainly couldn't keep a straight face doing that...
If he's an actor, I want to know who does his hair!
I'm sure this is a prank, people will share air when the pigs fly! Oh, wait... http://sharetheair.com/ ;)
"We would like to introduce you to our mascot -- Wendell, The Flying Air Quality Pig. Wendell will appear periodically on this website to help explain some things about air quality. We could have paid for a professional spokesman, but Wendell works pretty cheap, just a few bytes here and there."It astounds me that people buy bottled water where tap water is perfectly fine to drink so buying air isnt all that far away from that in my opinion.
For all her posturing, does this founder not realize how horrible this will be for the environment?
Packaging air in glass jars takes up an enormous amount of space and weight for shipping them around the globe (she hasn't mention how wide the distribution model will be).
Though this air is being marketed as a substitute for travel and and opportunity for new sensory experience, I can envision a future where it becomes a commodity product, scaled up, its value cheapened, and sold as a staple rather than a luxury item.
The obvious parallel is bottled water—a ubiquitous commodity sold half way around the world—except this has absolutely no utilitarian value and is even more critical to life.
I can imagine, when this is a billion dollar business, huge freight ships loading shipping containers of air for the privileged who feel like the air they have polluted is below them; socioeconomic groups will be defined by the very air they breathe: the poor will choke on the smog filled haze, while the rich will breathe their bottled air from the few places where it is still clean.
Packaging air in glass jars takes up an enormous amount of space and weight for shipping them around the globe (she hasn't mention how wide the distribution model will be).
Though this air is being marketed as a substitute for travel and and opportunity for new sensory experience, I can envision a future where it becomes a commodity product, scaled up, its value cheapened, and sold as a staple rather than a luxury item.
The obvious parallel is bottled water—a ubiquitous commodity sold half way around the world—except this has absolutely no utilitarian value and is even more critical to life.
I can imagine, when this is a billion dollar business, huge freight ships loading shipping containers of air for the privileged who feel like the air they have polluted is below them; socioeconomic groups will be defined by the very air they breathe: the poor will choke on the smog filled haze, while the rich will breathe their bottled air from the few places where it is still clean.
Main reason this is fake? Someone with lofty ideas about peace and love would have no interest in selling something that belongs to all of us children of mother earth. :)