Coronavirus testing using binary search method
2 comments
Yes. There are a whole lot of approaches that are far more efficient way of doing pooled tests.
There have been around half a dozen pre-print papers published on this concept in the COVID-19 section of biorxiv in the past couple of weeks [0].
0. https://connect.biorxiv.org/relate/content/181
There have been around half a dozen pre-print papers published on this concept in the COVID-19 section of biorxiv in the past couple of weeks [0].
0. https://connect.biorxiv.org/relate/content/181
Testing in the US is a waste of time because of our lack of coordination, and the very contagious nature of corona.
What point is there in testing somebody if they can catch it on the next trip to the grocery store? Do you test them after every grocery run?
Let nature run its course, like every other flu season.
What point is there in testing somebody if they can catch it on the next trip to the grocery store? Do you test them after every grocery run?
Let nature run its course, like every other flu season.
> Let nature run its course, like every other flu season.
You could use that same logic to argue against random breath testing drivers.
You could use that same logic to argue against random breath testing drivers.
I'm not very familiar with all the tests run, but surely something like this could be applied to the antibody one?
Would love to hear if anyone with more knowledge of the testing process and capabilities could give their thoughts...